Questions and Answers: PAPER 3
CEDOMIL VUGRINCIC, M.D., Ph.D.
LW - “It is true that the Urantia material contains false teachings. I directly asked
Mother (E.C.Prophet) about this
book in 1979 at a stump in
was taking questions and answers from those who attended, and she told me
that Mark (M.L.Prophet) had her study it and other books to discern truth from
error. It (The Urantia book) contains errors and the greatest error had to do with
the concept of the “Michael sons”.
She (E.C.P) told me in front of many people who were at a stump that chelas of
the ascended masters do not read or study this book, because of the mixture of
truth and error which contradicts our teachings.”
MKH- “When I came in contact with that book, about 1970 or so, before I found the
Teachings ( of Prophet’s), I could tell (was told by my HCS/the Holy Christ Self/
or Master?) that it was ridiculous because it claimed that Archangel Michael and
Jesus (Urantia’s Christ Michael, the Sovereign of our local universe of Nebadon),
were the same being. I did not waste any more time on it after that.”
LW - “You are right, the book says that Jesus and Michael are the same person, so the
obvious conclusion is that this is false teaching.”
A- The karmic consequences of the Elizabeth C. Prophet’s comments regarding
the Urantia book have been discussed sufficiently in the Q-A Paper 2 and the
Interim-paper VII. The rest belongs to the laws of limitations of the individual
and/or collective human evolutionary state of mind.
Have you ever condemn the school book because of the text you did not
understand, or have you rather patiently continued with your studies until such
times when the school text became perfectly understandable to you?
Speaking allegorically: - The earth was considered flat till 15thcentury and round
in the 16th century. Depending upon someone’s state of mind and incarnation,
someone could die or live for his/hers same beliefs during this period of time.
Is humanity today faring so much better with respect to the prosecution of
As far as the name of Michaels are concerned, are you saying that if anyone
in telephone book comes across the name Michael, the obvious conclusion he or
she should have is that only one Michael is real and all the others are false (?!).
Should someone rather, if interested, try to learn more about the (personalities
and identities of) other Michaels before we call them false?
When comments are made about the texts, such as the Urantia book, it must be
very important to point out exactly where such contradicting statements were
made and support them by evidence ( book, chapter and page number),
otherwise the comments become nothing more than just another hearsay.
The Urantia book says NOWHERE that the Michael of Nebadon, the Son
Of God, and the Archangel Michael are the same beings (persons).
It would be appreciated if you would correct everyone where it says otherwise?!
The Urantia book in Paper 33, p.366, speaks very clearly about the origin and
the person of (Christ) Michael of Nebadon, the Creator (Michael) Son of God.
In Lighttoparadise Paper 5, The Local Universe, it has been also written about
The Creator Sons of the
The Urantia is stating that our rather confused planet has become the divisional
headquarter of archangels for the local universe of Nebadon administration and
speaks of the “archangel of Michael” as the archangel of the resurrection.(p.409)
This by no means undermines the
dictations and the function of the
Michael as taught by The Church Universal and Triumphant and The Summit
It is very important to voice the opinion, even contradictory, as long as everyone
respects all other voiced opinions, and the prevailing collective mind will move
humanity, in time, to the next hurdle of the planetary school of life.
Regardless of the difference in opinion, your comments and questions are
appreciated in the continuation of our dialogs through Q-A papers.