EVIL AND LIBERTY

         ( The Urantia book, Paper 54, sect. 1, Edit)

                                 CEDOMIL VUGRINCIC, M.D., Ph.D.
                                                   May 2003
                                        
INTERIM-PAPER VI
                                                 ©
Copyright

 

Evolutionary man finds it difficult to comprehend fully and to grasp the meanings of evil, error,

sin, and iniquity, as well to distinguish between true and false liberty.

 

 

EVIL, ERROR, SIN, and INIQUITY

 

Man is slow to perceive that:

    - contrast in perfection and imperfection produce potential EVIL;

- conflicting truth and falsehood create confusing ERROR;

- the divine endowment of freewill choice eventuates in the divergent realms of SIN and

  RIGHTEOUSNESS;

- persistent pursuit of divinity leads to the KINGDOM OF GOD as contrasted with its

      continuous rejection, which leads to the domains of INIQUITY.

 

God neither creates evil nor permits sin and rebellion.

Potential evil is time-space existent in a universe embracing differential levels of perfection meanings and values.

 

Sin is potential in all realms where imperfect beings are endowed with the ability to choose between good and evil. The deliberate choice of evil constitutes sin.

 

The very conflicting presence of truth and untruth, fact and falsehood, constitutes the potential

for error. The willful rejection of truth is error.

 

The persistent pursuit of sin and error is iniquity.

 

 

TRUE AND FALSE LIBERTY

 

TRUE LIBERTY is the quest of the ages and the reward of evolutionary progress.

FALSE LIBERTY is subtle deception of the error of time and the evil of space.

ENDURING LIBERTY is predicated on the reality of justice of intelligence, maturity, brotherhood, and equality.

 

Liberty is self- destroying technique of human existence when its motivation is unintelligent, unconditioned and uncontrolled.

True liberty is progressively related to reality and is ever regardful of social equity, cosmic fairness, universe fraternity and divine obligations.

Liberty is suicidal when divorced from material justice, intellectual fairness, social forbearance, moral duty, and spiritual values.

Liberty is nonexistent apart from cosmic reality, where all personal reality is proportional to its relationships of divinity attainment.

 

Unbridled self-will and unregulated self-expression equal unmitigated selfishness,

the acme of ungodliness.

 

Liberty without the associated and ever-increasing conquest of self is a figment of egoistic

mortal imagination.

Self-motivated liberty is a conceptual illusion, a cruel deception.

“License for freedom” masquerading in the “garments of liberty” is the forerunner of abject bondage.

True liberty is the associate of genuine self-respect, while false liberty is the consort of

self-admiration.

True liberty is the fruit of self-control, while false liberty is the assumption of self-assertion.

 

Self-control leads to altruistic service, while self-admiration leads toward exploitation of others

for the selfish aggrandizement of such a mistaken individual, willing to sacrifice his righteous attainment for the sake of possessing unjust power over his fellow men.

 

Wisdom is divine and safe only when it is cosmic in scope and spiritual in motivation.

 

There is NO GREATER ERROR than the self-deception which leads intelligent beings to crave the exercise of power over other beings for the purpose of depriving these persons of their natural liberties.

The golden rule of human fairness cries out against such fraud, unfairness, selfishness and unrighteousness.

Only true liberty is compatible with the reign of love and the ministry of mercy.

 

How dare the self-willed creature to encroach upon the rights of his fellows in the name of

personal liberty when the Supreme Rulers of the Universe stand back in merciful respect for

these prerogatives of will and potentials of personality!

 

NO BEING, in the exercise of his “supposed” personal liberty, has a right to deprive any other being of those privileges of existence conferred by the creators and duly respected by all their loyal associates, subordinates, and subjects.

 

Early evolutionary man might resort to war for his material liberties, because war is the

heritage of lower evolutionary civilizations, but on the worlds of normal advancing civilizations physical combat as a technique of adjusting any kind of misunderstandings among men has

long since fallen into disrepute.

 

 

 

 

 

Reference:

The Urantia Book, Urantia Foundation